Judicial Pardon as an Alternative to a Judge's Decision

Ayu Dian Ningtias; Hadziqotun Nahdliyah; Ahmad Faris Shofa

doi:10.30736/ji.v13i1.365

Authors

Ayu Dian Ningtias Law Faculty University Of Islam Lamongan
Hadziqotun Nahdliyah Law Faculty University Of Islam Lamongan
Ahmad Faris Shofa Law Faculty University Of Islam Lamongan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v13i1.365

Keywords:

Keywords: legal consequences, judicial pardon, Criminal Code 2023

Abstract

ABSTRACT

There is a new concept in the renewal of criminal law, namely judicial pardon, this concept is also adopted by the Dutch legal system, in simple terms where the judge can forgive the defendant who is legally and convincingly proven to have committed a criminal offense. The formulation of the problem in this study is how the legal consequences of the enactment of the principle of judicial pardon in the Criminal Code 2023. From this research, the author analyzes that the legal consequences of the enactment of the principle of judicial pardon will largely have an impact on the character and nature of Indonesian criminal justice, and also has the potential to be one of the solutions to the current overcrowding problem. But the regulation of judicial pardon is still less specific, it also needs to be regulated in the Draft of the Criminal Procedure Code, such as in the form of a judicial pardon decision, there needs to be confirmation of the terms of judicial pardon, and it is also necessary to set limits or signs in order to obtain legal certainty and later not become a rubber article or become a multi-interpretation among judges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bibliography

Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2008.

Adery Syahputra, Tinjauan Atas Non-Imposing of a Penalty/ Rechterlijk Pardon/ Dispensa de Pena dalam R KUHP serta Harmonisasinya dengan R KUHP, Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, Jakarta, 2016.

Lukman Hakim, Penerapan Konsep Pemaafan hakim (Rechterlijk Pardon) Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta, 2019.

M Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHP, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2006.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Prenandamedia Group, Jakarta, 2008.

Rully Novian, Strategi mengenai Overcrowding si Indonesia: Penyebab, dan Penyelesaiannya, Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, Jakarta, 2018.

Anza Ronaza Bangun, Rechterlijk Pardon (Pemaafan Hakim) Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana di Sistem Pemidanaan Indonesia, Universitas Sumatra Utara. Vol. 2. No 5. 2023.

Adery Ardhan Saputro, Konsepsi Rechterlijk Pardon Atau Pemaafan Hakim Dalam Rancangan KUHP, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum. Vol. 28. No. 1. 2016.

M. Holy one, Mencari Kemungkinan Judicial Pardon Sebagai Salah Satu Alternatif Bentuk Pemidanaan, Jurnal Ilmiah Rinjani. Vol. 9. No. 1. 2021.

Nico Keizer dan D. Schaffmeister, Beberapa Catatan Tentang Rancangan Permulaan 1998 Buku I KUHP Baru Indonesia, yang dikutip oleh Adrey Ardhan Saputro, Konsepsi Rechterlijk Pardon atau Pemaafan Hakim dalam Rancangan KUHP, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Vol. 28. No. 1. Februari 2016.

Nefa Claudia Meliala. Rechterlijk Pardon (Pemaafan Hakim) : Suatu Upaya Menuju Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dengan Paradigma Keadilan Restoratif. Universita Katolik Parahyangan Bandung. Vol. 8. 2020.

Sahat Marisi Hasibuan, Kebijakan Formulasi Rechterlijk Pardon Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Vol. 9. No. 2. 2021.

Risano, A., Ningtias, A. D., & Yurita, R. (2021). Restotative Justice Policy Of Class I Drug Convicts Of Marijuana In Dealing With Over-Capacity Correctional Institutions In Indonesia. Jurnal Independent, 9(2), 13-21.

Ningtias, A. D., Nahdliyah, H., Nugroho, F. S., & Al Akbari, D. (2023). The principle of Restorative Justice in sentencingIn the 2023 Criminal Code. Jurnal Independent, 11(2), 563-574.