Settlement of Regional Election Results Disputes: A Normative Analysis of the Provisions of Legislation in Indonesia
Settlement of Regional Election Results Disputes: A Normative Analysis of the Provisions of Legislation in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v13i2.383Keywords:
The Election, Disputes, IndonesiaAbstract
Regional Head Elections (Pilkada) are a crucial pillar of Indonesia's democratic system, manifesting popular sovereignty at the local level. Despite being a manifestation of democracy, Pilkada often gives rise to disputes that impact political stability and public trust. This study aims to examine the legal regulations and mechanisms for resolving disputes over the results of Regional Head Elections in Indonesia and identify challenges and solutions in their implementation. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach. The results indicate that the Constitutional Court has the authority to handle disputes over the results of Regional Head Elections, while the Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu) and the State Administrative Court (PTUN) handle disputes over the process and state administration. However, implementation in the field faces challenges due to multiple interpretations of regulations, overlapping authority, and political pressure. Regulatory improvements, institutional strengthening, and legal education are needed to maintain the integrity of the Pilkada.
Downloads
References
Febriyanto, Satrio Alif, dan Muhammad Firman. "Napak tilas pemilihan kepala daerah indonesia: korelasi negara hukum yang demokratis dan amandemen uud 1945." Jurnal aphtn-Han 2, no. 1 (2023): 125-140.
Rochmwanto, Munif, Enik Isnaini, and Candra Tirta Hadinata. "The Position of The People’s Representative Council in the Indonesian Constitutional System." Jurnal Independent 13, no. 1 (2025): 10-21.
Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 3 Tahun 2024 tentang Tata Beracara Dalam Perkara Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, dan Walikota.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana Prenada Group, Jakarta, 2007.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 85/PUU-XX/2022 tentang Pengujian Pasal 157 ayat (1), Pasal 157 ayat (2), dan Pasal 157 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2015 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, dan Walikota menjadi Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Rochmawanto, Munif, Suisno, dan Zainal Hamdan Sakuroikan. 2024. “Batasan Usia Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023; Pendekatan Hukum”. Jurnal Independent 12 (2):188-99.
Shodiq, Ja’far, Ahmad Zainal Fanani, dan Umi Nur Aini Amanaturrofi’ah. “Persinggungan Konsep Pemilu di Indonesia Dengan Pemikiran Politik Dalam Islam”. Jurnal Independen 9, no. 2 (2021): 41-53.
Silalahi, Wilma. Demokrasi, Pilkada, dan Penyelesaian Hasil Pilkada di Mahkamah Konstitusi. PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Depok, Tahun 2020.
Sodiki, Achmad. Sengketa Pemilukada dan Putusan-Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, dalam Demokrasi Lokal, Evaluasi Pemilukada di Indonesia. Konpress, Malang, Tahun 2012.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Widodo, Aufia. "Sistem Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Yang Ideal Menurut UUD 1945." Awasia: Jurnal Pemilu dan Demokrasi 2, no. 1 (2022): 20-33
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Munir Rochmawanto, Fithriyatus Sholihah, Niswatun Faizah, Panji Dani Ramadhan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
