ABUSE OF CIRCUMSTANCES AS A CAUSE OF THE AVOIDATION OF  CONTACT IN THE CIVIL COURT AND ISLAMIC LAW

Ja'far Shodiq; Ulil Albab; Erika Husna Amalia Putri

doi:10.30736/ji.v10i1.341

Authors

Ja'far Shodiq Law Faculty University Of Islam Lamongan
Ulil Albab Law Faculty University Of Islam Lamongan
Erika Husna Amalia Putri Law Faculty University Of Islam Lamongan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v10i1.341

Keywords:

Keyword: Abuse of Circumstances, Avoidation of Contract , Civil Court , Islamic Law

Abstract

Abstraction

This research is library research. Regarding the termination of an engagement in the KUHper, Article 1381 explicitly mentions ten ways to terminate an engagement. These methods are: Payment, offer of cash payment followed by deposit or safekeeping (consignment), debt renewal (novation), debt settlement or compensation, debt mixing (confucio), debt relief, obliteration of outstanding goods, cancellation/cancellation, entry into force a condition is void, and the lapse of time (expiration).

Indeed, freedom of contract stems from the position of both parties being equally strong, having the same bargaining position, so that each party is domiciled as a contract partner. . The reality is not so, in making a contract each party, especially the party who is in a strong economic position, tries to seize dominance over the other party and face each other as opponents of the contract. The party whose position is stronger can impose his will on the other party for his own benefit, resulting in the content and terms of the contract being one-sided or unfair.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Budiono, Herlien. Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di bidang Kenotariatan.

Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.

Dewi, Gemala. Hukum Perikatan Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta, Kencana: 2006.

Hernoko, Agus Yudha. Hukum Perjanjian, Asas Proporsionalitas dalam

Kontrak Komersial. Yogyakarta : LaksBang Mediatama, 2008.

Miru, Ahmadi. Hukum Kontrak dan Perancangan Kontrak. Jakarta: Raja

Grafindo Persada, 2007.

Mulyadi, Kartini. dan Gunawan Widjaja. Perikatan Pada Umumnya. Jakarta: PT.

Raja Grafindo Persada: 2004.

Rusli, Hardijan. Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia dan Common Law. Jakarta:Sinar Harapan,2006.

Salim. Hukum Kontrak. Jakarta, Sinar Grafika: 2003.

Satrio, J. Hukum Perikatan (perikatan yang lahir dari undang-undang). Bandung,

P.T Citra Aditya Bakti: 1993.

------------- Hukum Perikatan (Tentang Hapusnya Perikatan). Bandung, PT. Citra

Aditya Bakti: 1996.

Subekti. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Intermas, 1996.

Tanya, Bernard L. Teori Hukum. Surabaya: CV KITA, 2007.

Wahbah. Alfiqhu al-isla>m wa adillatuhu>. Damaskus: Dar al-fikr, 1997.

Shodiq, Ja'far, Ahmad Zainal Fanani. "PERSINGGUNGAN KONSEP PEMILU DI INDONESIA DENGAN PEMIKIRAN POLITIK DALAM ISLAM." Jurnal Independent 9.2 (2021): 41-53.

RISANO, ALFREDO, and AYU DIAN NINGTIAS. "RESTOTATIVE JUSTICE POLICY OF CLASS I DRUG CONVICTS OF MARIJUANA IN DEALING WITH OVER-CAPACITY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS IN INDONESIA." Jurnal Independent 9.2 (2021): 13-21.