REGULATION OF FINGERPRINTING IN CRIMINAL CASES IN INDONESIA: AUTHORITIES AND LIMITATIONS

Authors

  • SUISNO SUISNO FAKULTAS HUKUM - UNIVERSITAS ISLAM LAMONGAN
  • ENIK ISNAINI FAKULTAS HUKUM - UNIVERSITAS ISLAM LAMONGAN
  • AHMAD ROYANI FAKULTAS HUKUM - UNIVERSITAS ISLAM LAMONGAN
  • MUNIF ROCHMAWANTO FAKULTAS HUKUM - UNIVERSITAS ISLAM LAMONGAN
  • BAMBANG EKO MULJONO FAKULTAS HUKUM - UNIVERSITAS ISLAM LAMONGAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v11i1.214

Keywords:

Fingerprinting, Criminal Cases, Authorities and Limitations

Abstract

Abstract
In the stage of the criminal case investigation process will be carried out through several
processes, one of which is by taking fingerprints. Fingerprints, which in English are called
fingerprints or ductyloscopy, are taken in the investigation process for further examination
of evidence that may be left at the scene of the crime. This research is a normative legal
research that reveals two main problems, first: What is the legal basis for taking fingerprints
inrevealingcriminalacts,second,howistheauthorityofinvestigatorsintaking
fingerprints to reveal criminal acts. In taking fingerprints until now there has been no
specific regulation, the name in the implementation of taking fingerprints of the Police is
based on Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the republic police and Law Number 8 of 1981
concerning criminal procedure law. And the authority of investigators in taking fingerprints
is contained in Article 15 letter h of the Law on the Indonesian National Police (Law of the
Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2002) Jo Article 7 paragraph 1 of the Criminal
Procedure Code (KUHAP).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bibliography

Andi Hamzah. 2008. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafik Offset.

Departemen Pertahanan Keamanan Markas Besar Kepolisian Republik Indonesia,

Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Fungsi Identifikasi Polri, Nomor : Juklak/08/V/1981.

Departemen Pertahanan Keamanan Markas Besar Kepolisian Republik Indonesia, Petunjuk

Pelaksanaan Fungsi Identifikasi Polri. Nomor : Juklak/08/V/1981.

Gerson W. Bawwengan. Penyidikan Perkara Pidana dan Teknik Interogasi, Penerbit :

Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta. 1987

Henny Saida Flora.Sidik Jari Pengungkap Tindak Pidana dalam

http://www.analisadaily.com.diakses pada tanggal 29 Maret 2023.

Juknis Nomor Polisi : Juknis/04/III/1991, Pengembangan Sidik Jari Laten Dengan Serbuk

Serta Pemindahannya/Pengangkatannya (Lifting).

Markas Besar Kepolisian Republik Indonesia. Penuntun Daktiloskopi, Subdirektorat

Identifikasi Direktorat Reserse Polri, 1986.

Nur’aini A.M. 2003. Hukum AcaraPidana. Yogyakarta:Fakultas Syariah IAIN Sunan

Kalijaga.

Romli Atmasasmita. 1984. Bunga Rampai KRIMINOLOGI. Jakarta: CV. Rajawali.

UU No. 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik

Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana

Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana

Downloads

PlumX Metrics

Published

2023-03-14

How to Cite

SUISNO, S., ISNAINI, E., ROYANI, A., ROCHMAWANTO, M., & MULJONO, B. E. (2023). REGULATION OF FINGERPRINTING IN CRIMINAL CASES IN INDONESIA: AUTHORITIES AND LIMITATIONS. Jurnal Independent, 11(1), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v11i1.214

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>