A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF JUDICIAL RESTRAINT AND ACTIVISM ON THE MATERIAL REVIEW OF PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v11i1.213Keywords:
Judicial Restraint, Judicial Activism, Presidential Threshold Constitutional Court.Abstract
AbstractThe doctrine of Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism has become a debate in
democraticcountriesondecisionsrelatedtothepresidentialnominationthreshold
(presidential threshold) made by the Constitutional Court. In the application of judicial
restraint, judges are more self-limiting in deciding a case and are more restrained in their
authority, in contrast to judicial activism which is more active and brave in providing new
legal breakthroughs on the norms being tested. In this paper, the formulation of the problem
to be discussed is How the Decision of the Constitutional Court Judges Applying the Doctrine
of Judicial Restraint Against the Presidential Threshold Lawsuit in the Presidential Election
and the Development of Democracy in Indonesia and How the Relationship between the
Decision of the Constitutional Court Judges Using the Doctrine of Judicial Activism Against
the Presidential Threshold Lawsuit in the Presidential Election and the Development of
Democracy in Indonesia. This paper also uses normative legal research methods, which is a
process to analyze legal rules, legal principles and legal doctrines. The problem approach in
this writing is the statute approach and conceptual approach.
Downloads
References
Bibliography
Books and Journals
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional di Berbagai Negara,(
Jakarta:Konstitusi Press,2005)
------------------------. Teori dan Aliran Penafsiran Hukum Tata Negara, (Jakarta:Ind-
Hill Co. 1998),
Asshidiqie, Jimly. Hukum Tata Negara & Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi (Jakarta: Sinar
Grafika, 2010)
Asy'ari,Syukuri “Model dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam
Pengujian Undang-Undang (Studi Putusan Tahun 2003-2012) jurnal Konstitusi,
Volume 10, Nomor 4, Desember 2013.
Barak, Aharon. The judge in a Democracy, ( Princeton : Princeton University
Press.,2006)
Benvindo ,Juliano Zaiden. On the Limits of Constitutional Adjudication:
Deconstructing Balancing Judicial Activism, (New York: Springer,2010)
Berger,Raoul dan Robert Bork dalam Jerold Waltman, Principle Judicial Restraint: A
Case Against Activism, ( New York:Mcmillan,2015)
Carrithers,David Wallace kata pengantar dalam buku “The Spirit of the Lawsâ€,
Montesquieu, (Bandung.Nusa Media,2007
Ghafur, Jamaludin. Presidential Threshold: Sejarah, Konsep, dan Ambang Batas
Persyaratan Pencalonan dalam Tata Hukum di Indonesia, penerbit Setara Press,
Malang 2019.
Manan, Bagir. Kekuasaan Kehakiman Republik Indonesia, (Bandung: LPPM
Universitas Islam Bandung,1995),
Marzuki ,Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Group, 2007,
Mochtar,Zainal Arifin, “Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Diskursus
judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint) Depok, Rajawali Pers. 2021.
Scalia,Anntonin. Common Law Courts in a Civil Law System: The Role of United
States Federal Courts in Interpreting the Constitution and Laws, (Princeton:
Princeton Univeristy Press, 1995)
Scalia,Antntonin, et.al. A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the law (
Princeton : Princeton University Press,1997)
Tanya,Bernard L, Yoan N Simanjuntak, and Markus Y Hage, Teori Hukum: Strategi
Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang Dan Generasi (Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing,2019
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
