CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR PERSONS OF CRIMINAL ACTION OF HAND PHONE PROCEEDINGS FROM A CRIME BASED ON DECISION NUMBER 1870/Pid.B/2022/PN SURABAYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v11i1.187Keywords:
Criminal Liability, Handpone Containment, CrimeAbstract
The crime of extortion or the crime of facilitating this is a crime that is closely related to the crime of destroying other people’s assets. The crime of extortion or the crime of facilitating this is regulated in the title XXX, Book II in Article 480 of the Criminal Code (KUHP). Withholding as described in the article can be said to be an act of “conspiracyâ€. The act of receiving objects obtained because of a crime is not seen as a crime that stands alone or as a zelfstandig misdrijft, but as an act of helping to commit a crime or as a medeplichtigheid in a crime, that is, by which act the perpetrator can obtain the objects obtained. from crime
 The main issues that will be discussed in writing this thesis are how criminal responsibility is for the perpetrators of criminal acts of receiving cellphones as the result of a crime based on Decision Number 1870/Pid.B/2022/PN Surabaya and what are the legal considerations of judges in deciding the perpetrators of criminal acts of collecting cellphones proceeds from a crime based on Decision Number 1870/Pid.B/2022/PN Surabaya.
Based on this normative juridical research approach is used Using the case approach (Case Approach) aims to study the application of legal norms or rules carried out in legal practice. Especially regarding cases that have been decided as can be seen in the jurisprudence of cases that are the focus of research. The case approach (Case Approach) is used by practitioners in conducting research by identifying court decisions that have qualified jurisprudence to be used in concrete cases. Furthermore, the statutory approach (Statute Approach), this approach is carried out by examining all laws and regulations that are related to the problems (legal issues) that are being faced.
In the crime of collection, the perpetrator already knows or should suspect that the item or object is the result of a crime. Meanwhile, the motive of the intermediary acts almost always to enrich oneself in one way or another that cannot be allowed, so to take advantage of other people's crimes. The intermediary is always related to goods "obtained from crime
Â
Â
Downloads
References
Abdul kadir Muhamad Sunardi Danny Tanuwijaya, Abdul Wahid, Republik†Kaum Rats," Reflection on Legal Powerlessness and Human Rights Enforcement, Cet IJakarta: Crown Edsa, 2005
Abdul Manan, Application of Civil Procedure Law in the Religious Courts. Jakarta: Kencana, 2006
Abdul kadir Muhammad, Law and Legal Research, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004
Adami chazawi, majoring in Criminal Law (Criminal Stetsel, Criminal Acts, Theory-Theory of Sentence & Limits of Applicability of Criminal Law), Jakarta Section: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2002
Adami, Chazawi. Crime Against Property. Malang: Bayumedia. 2004
Ahmad Rifai, Legal Findings by Judges in a Progressive Legal Perspective, Jakarta: Sinar Graphics, 2010
Andi Hamzah. Principles of Criminal Law. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. 1997
----------------, Indonesian Criminal and Penalty System from Retribution to Reformation, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1986
Andi Zainal Abidin. The Principles of Criminal Law Part One. London: Alumni, 1987
US. Nature, Criminology An Introduction, Jakarta, Kencana, 2018
Burhan Ashshofa, Legal Research Methods, Cet. 2nd, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.2003
B. Simandjuntak, Introduction to Criminology and Social Pathology, Bandung: Tarsito, 1981
Elizabeth Nurhaini Butarbutar, Freedom of Civil Judges in Discovery law and antinomy in its application, Yogyakarta: Journal Law pulpit Vol.23 No.1. Gadjah University Faculty of Law Mada, 2011
Hanafi Amrani, Mahrus Ali, Criminal Accountability System, Printing first, Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2015
H. Salim Hs. and Erles Septian Nurbani, Application of Legal Theory in Research Thesis and Dissertation, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2013
J.E. Jonkers in Adami Chazawi, Lesson of Criminal Law, Part 1; System Criminal, Criminal Theories & Limits of Applicability of Criminal Law, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo, 2002
Kadir Husin and Budi Rizki Husein, Indonesian Criminal Justice System, Jakarta: Sinar Graphics, 2016
Lexy J. Moleong, Qualitative Research Methodology, Bandung: Rosdakarya Youth, 2004
Lilik Mulyadi, The Face of the Judge's Decision in Criminal Procedure Law Indonesia, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014
Lawrence M. Friedman, The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1969
----------------------------- Legal System Social Science Perspective, Bandung: Nusa Medium, 2011
Loden Mapaung, Principles of Theory-Practice-Practice of Criminal Law. Jakarta: Sinar Graphics, 2005
M. Solly Lubis, Loc. Cit. According to Mukti Fajar N.D and Yulianto Achmad, framework The theory is structured as a foundation of thinking that shows from the point of view where the problem that has been selected will be highlighted. Mukti Fajar N.D and Yulianto Achmad, 2010, Dualism of Normative & Empirical, Yogyakarta: Student Library, 2010
Moeljanto, Criminal Law Principles, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008
Moeljatno, Criminal Acts and Accountability in Criminal Law,Bandung: Bina Literacy, 1983
Muladi and Barda Nawawi Arief, Criminal Theories and Policy, Bandung: Alumni, 1984
Muladi, Conditional Criminal Institution, (Bandung: Alumni Publisher, 2002 P.A.F Lamintang, Fundamentals of Indonesian Criminal Law, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1997
_____________, Crime Against Property, Jakarta: Sinar Graphic, 2009
Poerwadar Minta W.J.S. Indonesian General Dictionary, (Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2003
Roeslan Saleh. Criminal Acts and Criminal Liability. Jakarta: New Character, 1999
-----------------, Thoughts About Criminal Liability, Print First, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2009
Roeslan Saleh, Criminal Acts and Criminal Liability, in Mahrus Ali, Fundamentals of Criminal Law, Jakarta: Sinar Graphic, 2011
R. Soesilo, Criminal Code (KUHP), Bogor: Politeia, 1995
Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, Legal Research Methods and Jury metry, (jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2008
Satochid Kartanegara, Criminal Law Part One, Jakarta: Literature Center Student, 1998
Satjipto Raharjo, Law Enforcement Issues, Bandung: Blue Light, 1983
Sidharta, Reform and State Responsibility, Anthology of the Commission
Judicial, Judge's Decision, Between Justice, Legal Certainty, and Benefits, Judicial Commission of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta: Commission Judicial Republic of Indonesia, 2010
Soerjono Soekanto and Sri Mamudji, 2012, Normative Legal Research ABrief Overview, Issue 1. Cet. 14th Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2012
Soerjono Soekanto, Introduction to Legal Research, Jakarta: UI Press, 1986
Sudarto, Law and Criminal Law, Bandung: Alumni, 1977
Soerjono Soekanto and Abdullah Mustafa, Sociology of Law in Society,Jakarta: Rajawali, 1980
Suseno and Franz Magnis. Political Ethics, Basic Moral Principles of the State Modern, Jakarta: Gramedia, 1988
Theo Hujibers, Philosophy of Law in the Trajectory of History, Yogyakarta: Kanasius, 1982
Tri, Andrisman. Certain Offenses in the Criminal Code. Bandar Lampung: University Lampung, 2012
Wirjono Projodikoro, Principles of Criminal Law in Indonesia, Jakarta: Eresco,1981
Wirjono Prodjodikoro, Certain Criminal Acts in Indonesia, Jakarta: Ersco, 1980
Legislation
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia
The Criminal Code (KUHP)
The Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
